FAT RIGHTS PRESSURE GROUP DEMONISES BEING SKINNY

 

This week it became official in New Zealand: being skinny is not considered normal.

Fat-rights campaigners have managed to pull from the shop fronts of one of N.Z’s largest fashion retailers mannequins it considers ‘too skinny’.  

For the record my daughter is the same size as one of the ‘offending’ mannequins.   

She is blessed with good genes – mine- plus exercises about 10 hours a week.  

Now let’s turn this travesty of political correctness around to the point the faux logic eats itself. 

The whimpish Hallenstein Glassons decided to put out obese mannequins in their place, fat being the new normal. 

Would they bow down to pressure from a petition from skinny girls “these body images are unachievable”? 

No fucking way. 

The skinny girl who watches what she eats, gets out and exercises is considered to be abnormal in this country.   

 

Doing rowing and triathlon, eating health could lead you to being.....OMG.....skinny! 

In what must be the most absurd health advice ever issued being skinny “sends a potentially dangerous message” according to so called experts, who should have their medical licences terminated for being incompetent and deluded.    

The fat bimbo teen already with an arse the size of a Cook Straight Ferry and thighs any All Black would be proud of is considered normal.  

Let’s be open and honest here. 

Being fat is always unhealthy, not being skinny - except in the extreme of cases where there is an eating disorder.   

It is possible for 90 per cent of the population to get down to a normal build for their body shape. 

Sometimes this normal will even be skinny in the eyes of others. 

The pro-obesity group, fellow fat arses behind the petition to get the mannequins pulled should have asked some doctors “What is healthy build”? 

“Being skinny like this plastic doll or being fat at the age of 18?”  

The answer is clear to anyone except those that most need this advice – the fat bastards and their advocates!     

Shame on Hallensteins demonising teenagers who are skinny and live active, healthy lives.

I will never shop there again.

                  These skinny chicks really need to put on some weight, they are so unhealthy.  

My Sure-Fire Way to Stop the Obesity Epidemic

Lancet researchers found more than 2 billion people worldwide are now overweight or obese.  

That’s right: one third of the humans on the planet are fat and lazy bastards. 

Not one country has been successful curbing the epidemic.

And it won’t be until the media portrays obese people as fat and lazy bastards that this issue will be tackled head-on, the health systems we pay for won't collapse under their ample weight.

As I have suggested previously a policy of social ostracising is one way to get results. 

I am doing my bit to better the health outcomes of my fellow humans by creating these ‘motivational’ posters.

Imagine sitting down and seeing these State-Sponsored ‘messages’ on your television!  

Effective, eh?

 

 

 

 

Since the Morning after Pill doesn’t work for fat chicks, why fuck em’ in the first place?

The most astounding revelation to the news that the widely-used morning-after pills is less effective in preventing pregnancy in woman over 70kgs,  is the salient point Kiwi men are actually having sex with them in the first place. 

Are Kiwi men in New Zealand just not fussy?  

That desperate for sex, or that drunk not to care who they are banging?    

Do they want a brat with a fat 'nameless' bimbo they picked-up at the pub?  

Clearly today's N.Z women care less about their weight than their mothers with the average weight going up 12 kilos in one generation.   

62kgs in sixties New Zealand and now 74 kilos in 2014.   

Use of the morning after pill generally indicates casual sex and the prevention of an unwanted pregnancy.  

The simple solution to the ‘morning after pill’ being rendered a third effective by the women’s weight is for men to not fuck them.   

 

Do society a favour - go home and have wank instead.  

The same applies to women contemplating having sex with fat guys. 

Don’t! 

Let fat people sit on the margins (naturally after strengthening them) of society.  

Then let Darwinsm work its magic. 

In one or two generations – no more fat people!    

Footnote: Congratulations to radio presenter Rachel Smalley calling New Zealand women "heifers" and "a bunch of lardos”. She is dead right and needs industry accolades rather than complaints which will doubtless come from the very same ‘heifers’ she describes. The fatties with time to write letters, consume a packet of biscuits but not to exercise.  

 

 

 

 

Fat Parents Fat Kids

I have been on a radical get fit program. 

Walking, swimming and weights.

I have lost 4 kilos and plan to lose 3 more.  

One thing is apparent to anyone who goes to a swimming pool… 

Fat parents breed fat kids.   

The offspring of fat parents are virtually all obese, in-line for ill-health.   

According to my failing eyesight there is no such thing as thin parents and fat kids.  

Why are we beating about the fucking bush here peoples? 

If I was to repeatedly inject a substance into my children’s bodies that would reduce their lifespans: I would be arrested and the children taken into care.   

Why do we allow parents who have no respect for their own health to inflict their own detrimental lifestyles on to their children?   

We don’t allow parents to shove a smoke in the gob of their kids, now do we?  

But it’s fine to serve KFC and Maccers to a 3 year old breakfast, lunch and dinner!  

You can feed a baby Coke and nothing will happen. 

In closing remember my mantra… 

Don’t fuck a fatty!

KIWI WOMAN SO FAT SHE DIDN’T EVEN KNOW SHE WAS PREGNANT!

When your fifty-something’ wife agrees with your proposition, during a trip to Paris “the local chicks are hot” you know you have the mark of approval. 

It’s not just that women from France look after their diets and exercise patterns in greater numbers than New Zealand women – they dress way better as well.  

What is frightening is the large numbers of obese teenage women in New Zealand.   

They don’t do themselves any favours either by covering themselves in ugly tattoos, dressing at fashion outlets, possessing a wardrobe with at least five pairs of tracksuit bottoms and donning rugby jersey’s for social occasions.        

It’s got so bad around these parts that a young local Christchurch woman, Sarah Greig, didn’t even know she was pregnant until the contractions started!  

Her partner – who was presumably still banging her for 8/9 months, saw her naked on the odd occasion – didn’t know she was up the duff either!  

Greig claims she had no obvious pregnancy symptoms, believed her contractions to be just a bad stomach ache. Leading up-to the birth she had felt more lethargic than normal tired and surprise/surprise, had developed food cravings.  

I may be a wee bit old fashioned here but some of the obvious signs one is pregnant are your period stopping and the ‘bump out front’.  

Short of dressing in a kaftan, retreating to a cave how could you disguise a pregnancy?   

The politically correct media have been all-over this story without actually mentioning the ‘elephant in the room’ (pun intended) nor bothered to include a full photo of Ms Greig.    

At just 22 Sarah Greig must have been really, really fat.       

 

 

 

Why do Airlines discriminate against normal sized and skinny people with a single suitcase?

All airlines operate a cargo service in one form or another. 

For decades they have charged air-freight customers on a combination of the greater of the actual weight versus the size. 

A big box of feathers would be charged on the size and not the actual weight. 

An infinitely fair and universal rating policy, no one sees as being ‘unjust’.    

So why therefore should a 90 kilogram person be charged the same as a 150kg person when it comes to an identical passenger seat?   

Why is the total kilo count of the baggage also never factored in?  

Due to wooly-wofter airlines being so ‘politically correct’ they are afraid to instigate what is an infinitely and fair system of rating passengers the same as an air-freight consignment. 

Passenger + Baggage = Total Kilos   

Go over a threshold of say 135kgs and you are charged extra.  

On my last flight I was 90kgs total (comprising 85 + 5 ) and I consider myself to be of average build.  

I am being more than generous with a threshold of 135kgs being 45kgs (approx. 100lbs) more than what I ‘carry’ on a flight.   

It’s hard to argue that currently normal sized and skinny customers, those that pack practically aren't subsidising other passengers given aviation fuel is the airlines largest cost.  

I for one would support the first airline that instigated a fair passenger rating schedule.  

The first major airline to announce a fair rating system would make a killing, spell disaster for fatty/packy friendly airlines as their most profitable clients went off to the new guys and they were left with the dross, having to be re-fuelled in-air to get to their destination.     

Fatties and over-packers could moan “We won’t be using ‘that’ airline” but they invariably would be faced with higher fares that reflected the extra fuel they burn now they weren’t getting subsidised by other passengers.   

Normal travellers would enjoy cheaper fares, not have to put up with obese seat-mates for 13 hours and be able to put their bags in a locker not stuffed to the gunnels with suitcases.         

All in all I’m sick of being discriminated against. 

Legions of fatties and over-packers deliberately being ignored at check-in counters least airlines up-set them.  

 

Passengers being permitted suitcases bigger than my own as 'carry-on'.

I would also like to those passengers that are so obese they ‘spill’ into other seats automatically pay for two seats. No exceptions. No pissing around pandering to them.

 

 

 

PLUS SIZE CLOTHING PEOPLE STOP MOANING OVER NOTHING AND BUY SOME RUNNING SHOES

Plus Clothing is a politically correct term for ‘Fat Folk Clothing’.  

There are Plus Sized ‘Fat Folks’ Clothing stores the length and breadth of the land.    

These stores cater for the growing obese community who know where their bread is buttered (with lard)  

After yesterday’s article about Abercrombie and Fitch I now regret New Zealand doesn’t have a similar athletic branded store.  

A brand which targets people of ‘normal’ build – that’s to say people in the normal BMI band for their size/weight.       

It amazes me that anyone would complain against a shop that sells clothing one size and not another? 

Don’t shop there is the simple solution.  

It is clear fatties feel they are being persecuted, the new gays, conveniently ignoring all those Fat Folk Clothing companies. 

To my knowledge there’s not a single exclusively athletic clothing store outside Abercrombie and Fitch, nothing here in Christchurch that’s for sure.   

We don’t see mobs of triathletes and rowers protesting outside Plus Stores about this inequality, now do we?      

That’s because fat people want to wear athletic people clothing – never the other way around (round – get it?)     

When you weigh-up (two of me = 1 of her) the facts the people who are being discriminated against when it comes to clothing choices are in the skinny to normal band (as in gastric)  

Bowing to PC crap are the clothing manufacturers/stores forced to stock fat clothing rather than risk being accused of being ‘sizeist’.   

 

    

You read it right: Fat people are lazy whingers

The planet needs more people 'naming and shaming' fatties like these two personal-trainers from Australia.

Fight Stupid Groups like Fight the Obesity Epidemic

Many of us are eating too much junk food, not getting enough exercise, and are getting fat. Obesity contributes to premature death, serious diseases and increasing health costs. The solution is to change features of the environment that lead us to eat too much of the wrong foods and reduce our physical activity opportunities.

 

There are plenty of misguided but well-meaning pressure groups in N.Z society. 

But few that can honestly be branded as plain stupid. 

Amongst the top of the heap when it comes to share stupidity comes ‘Fight the Obesity Epidemic’.  

According to their religious like mantra espoused by FOE, N.Z should:  

Stop the promotion of unhealthy food to children = cut advertising of fast foods around the time children can see them, in case 10 year olds grab the family car and drive straight to Mc Donalds salivating the entire journey.    

Having labels on food packaging, such as a traffic light system, so that shoppers can easily identify healthy and unhealthy foods = demand manufacturers of blatantly fat foods tell punters ‘This product is chocker block of crap’ when any simpleton knows this.   

Introducing tax changes and/or subsidies to make healthy food more affordable relative to less healthy food = Tax legitimate business’s for the poor choices of a section their customers. Not all consumers of ice-cream for example are obese. No one in my family could be considered fat and we all enjoy ice-cream on occasion. To propose we should pay more for a product someone else abuses is clearly wrong. It's akin to taxing non-smokers.   

FOE can’t seem to grasp the simple concept: people become fat because they eat too much crap and don’t exercise enough.   

There are no comparable campaigns to avoid certain foods in sub-Saharan Africa and for good reason I might add. 

That’s because the food they have access to in this region is often less than that one needs to function. 

In its base form food is energy.  

Consume too little or too much and it’s adverse to one’s health.  

So lets for a brief moment imagine N.Z adopting FOE’s Stalinist polices when it comes to obesity. 

KFC and even your ‘one dollar’ sweet mixtures from the local dairy would be festooned with skull and cross-bones health warnings. 

The price of a bottle of Coke would go up and the Government would replace adverts for Burger King with the vegetable and fruit range at Fresh Choice.  

Adverts for Cadbury’s chocolate would appear in the back-pages of N.Z Truth magazine beside those of an out-call massage.

The gapping hole in FOE’s campaign is that niggling factoid:   

‘Fat people already know their over-eating is going to result in health issues and premature death’  

Fat people know what a good diet is, that pizza every night is not a good thing.  

Fat people know about the benefits of exercise. 

They choose instead to ignore them and indulge in excessive often crappy food. 

Fat people can’t be fucked walking the dog around the block after work.  

Nothing FOE proposes will change the mind-set of fat folk in New Zealand.    

 

  

 

 

A kilo is a kilo

A kilo is a kilo and that’s what drives airline profitability, the major cost running any airline being fuel. 

 

Samoan Air has introduced a policy to charge passengers by their weight - rather than under a normal fare – thus becoming the first airline to do so globally.

 

Passengers pay a price per kilogram they weigh, and the price varies according to the length of the route.  

Let’s hope other airlines throw-off their politically correct shackles and also introduce similar rating schedules which reflect the total weight carried on the flight i.e. passenger plus bags = X amount. 

Charging by weight is fair which-ever system airlines employ.  

Charging by size/volume is the norm when it comes to air-freighting goods.   

So no-one moans when someone gets charged less on 80 kilos of freight versus 130 kilos of freight, now do they?  

When I travelled to Europe last year with ‘my mrs’, between us our packs and combined blubber would have been less than 175 kilos.   

There would have been individuals on the flights plus their carrier-on luggage that weighed more than this.  

I would have no problem paying more than couple/bags on the same route that weighed less.   

Speaking about carrier on luggage – when the fuck do people need to carry so much?  

Are they expecting a hijacking?  

What the hell is inside their bloated carry-on bags?  

Twenty sets of underwear, ball gown, a large 18th century family bible as reading material?  

Now on to larger passengers = fatties. 

Seats on planes are largely uniform – one size fits all, this is a failing.  

We all know the global obesity problem exists so plonking a 150 kilogram person into a seat made for 90 kilos is a recipe for an unpleasant trip for the individual and his/her neighbours.  

That’s why once you get over a certain girth passengers should be made to buy two seats. 

A trip to Europe from New Zealand would go up by NZD 2,700 a great incentive for anyone to purchase a good pair of walking shoes six months in advance of their flights and improve their personal health at the same time.    

If that doesn’t sound fair for the 150 kilo person - is it fair for the poor people either side of them who have to endure their ‘spill-over’?  

Would the 150 kilo person want to sit next door to someone who also weighs similar?  

Placing all fat people together on flights irrespective of their travel partners would be one way to emphasis the way they inconvenience other passengers.   

Create a true cattle class.    

I live to see the day when a 160 kilo guy looks to his middle seat on a 12 hour flight to see on either side there’s a 140 kilo girl in the ailse seat and a 190 kg guy wedged into the window.   

Congratulations to Samoan Air.   

Other airlines take note.

 

PS: I’m away for two weeks shortly. Comments/Abuse cleared on my return