This is a mug-shot
of Erana Te Haeata Brewerton, a 60-year-old Maori who was up in Japan recently
on some junket.
Her facial
tattoo saw her barred from a hot spring in Hokkaido and she went bleating to
the media crying it was all too “culturally insensitive”.
Bullshit.
For
starters the Japan Bathhouse has the right to ban who-ever it sees fit, serve
the best interests of the business, particularly the ‘bread and butter’ locals.
Secondly Ms
Breweton this is Japan and not New Zealand.
You were a
visitor so why not be equally sensitive to their culture?
The Japanese
hate tattoos because of their criminal connotations.
They lump
all tattoos together, don’t have time to run it by the N.Z Embassy.
Nor can the
spas owner be expected to tell a so called ‘traditional’ tattoo from a similar
one some chick got done one drunken night in Thailand.
The hot
spring made the right decision not allowing you entry.
You need to
wake up and accept that tattoos particularly facial ones are intimidating, globally
associated with gangs.
Go to any maximum
security prison and you’ll soon see the ‘customers’ are all tatted up.
Many N.Z
prisoners have tattoos not too similar to your own and are equally passionate
about them.
Maori
criminal fraternity is all but 100% tatted-up.
Here are
some examples of modern-day ta mokos equally valid to a layman as Ms Brewerons.
1 comment:
You are not only an idiot - but a racist one. Assuming all facial tattoos are the same is ignorant. Most atheist I engage with are not ignorant people but highly educated and less judgemental. Perhaps a crash course in the effects of colonisation might very well be in order. I suggest Ranginui Walkers Ka Whawhai Tonu Matou - Struggle Without End. personally I take a leaf out of Stephen fry's approach to atheism - which again is intelligent - not judgemental and inclusive. On behalf of all tattooed Pākehā academic atheists learn about Māori tattoos Canterbury Atheist or crawl back into your bigoted hole.
a
Post a Comment