
Bizarre as it sounds, The Holy Prepuce, or Holy Foreskin was, purportedly saved & preserved by a Jewish woman, when Jesus Christ, was eight days old.
I joke you not, there are folk that take this stuff seriously.
One presumes, this unnamed Jewish woman, must have possessed psychic-powers, in order to recognise a Messiah brat, from all the other week-old new-born, and cognate the importance of flogging his foreskin and preserving-it, for posterity.
In a stunning historic oversight and quirk, Christian devotees at the time, thought a bit of Jesus Christ’s penis was a more significant relic to preserve, than say a single word of his writing , or description of his appearance?!
To further demean Christian historians and show what a bunch of oddballs these disciples were, they managed to mummify all-important body-parts of their God-Man, like the foreskin, yet failed to leave us a legacy like a painting or a sculpture.
Bumbling Christian historians, recorded Jesus’s foreskin was removed, eight-days after he was born - but forgot to note down the actual date of the birth itself!
As the story goes, and in another lucky coincidence for Christians, the enterprising intuitive Jewish old-duck, had a son who was a chemist, and it was him who was able to embalm part of Jesus’s cock, for Christians to worship-over, centuries later.
In another twist, evidently Jesus had a big cock.
From the share number of his foreskins floating around Europe, John Holmes himself, would have blushed at it’s size.
So would a mature male rhinoceros.
There happens to be portion of JC’s foreskin in Rome, Antwerp, Besancon, Newport, Metz, Coulombs, Heldesheim, Charroux, Langres, Fecamp, and Stoke-on-Trent of all places.
There’s two Church's in Auvergre, France alone, with claims on a bit of JC’s cock.
Eighteen places in total, where it’s preserved as a true holy relic.
Weird but true.
Goes with the territory.




4 comments:
Damn that image, I can't look away! That can't be real. Depressing.
Sadly, for you & me, the expression on her face, tells it all!
Note: come back tomorrow, there's another article which is just as depressing.
Cheers BT.
Paul.
I realize 2,000 years and a long soaking in alcohol based preservatives may distort its visual impact somewhat. But can we tell if he is the fair-skinned, Nordic, redhead of chrsitian art or indeed a dark-skinned, middle-eastern, desert dweller. Or based on the size you describe, could it be from a sub-Saharan African... a black man? Oh the joy if that news broke!
That could also explain why the "splinters" of the cross make a structure much larger than any cross. They needed extra support beams for his cock.
Post a Comment