Remember how we are sold the story that Adam and Eve were created intrinsically ‘good’ by the God chap.
They lead a pristine life ‘naked as jay-birds’ until they ate that dreaded fruit.
It was only after they ate the fruit, thanks to the convincing spiel from a talking snake, that they realised it was in-fact actually ‘bad’ to go about starkers, and started donning fig-leaves.
It was the wearing of the fig-leaves that alerts the God chap, something is up with his pet creations.
Now the contradiction is obvious here.
Being naked was part of Adam & Eve’s sinless pre-apple days.
Being clothed is a part of Adam & Eves life as sinners.
So there are only two logical ways, one can look at this conundrum …..
1.) Being naked is what God wants of his highest creations.
2.) There was sin before, Adam and Eve ate the apple, destroying a basic tenant of Christianity.
So which one is it?