tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5352263427762940860.post2215279918880081249..comments2024-01-23T16:25:46.293+13:00Comments on Canterbury Atheist: Did you hear the one about the Moon Splitting in Two?Canterbury Atheistshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09900223059660267657noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5352263427762940860.post-21595436634540138962008-08-08T22:27:00.000+12:002008-08-08T22:27:00.000+12:00the learned author had passed comments marginalisi...the learned author had passed comments marginalising the siginificant importance of prophets in view of scientific conclusions which conclusions could not stand match to the miracle of prophets by sheer human wisdom.i understand the learned author being athiest has to try something logicaly to negate the existence of GOD being non figurative within five human senses; yet; also try to nullify the physical aspect of spiritual person of pophets.the moon spillting could be one instance now in- admissible within the perception of science; more surprising for the learned author would be to notice that prophets of isreal were bestowed miracle of reverting the dead into life; keeping the seas dry to facilitate prophets to cross{refer prophet Moses crossing Egyptian sea when confronting phoroah} and get phical foods from sky which the holy quran quotes"Mun-u-swalwah"when legal jurisprudence failed to associate the cause of events to some logic they said it is "vis major" being shy to intrepret it act of GOD.i have high regards for the author ; but; soon i may quote the valued athiest "bertrand Rusell"contradicting his own stand. thanksAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com